BDMS-453#349
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 71d6a96626
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| revision: str = "d1a2b3c4e5f6" | ||
| down_revision: Union[str, Sequence[str], None] = "c9f1d2e3a4b5" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix missing Alembic down_revision
The migration declares down_revision as c9f1d2e3a4b5, but there is no corresponding revision file in alembic/versions, so the migration graph is disconnected and alembic upgrade head will fail to resolve this dependency. This blocks schema upgrades in any environment that runs migrations. Point down_revision at the current head revision (e.g., 5f4e2b0a6b8b) or add the missing revision.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
there is no hydraulics data in the HydraulicsData table |
Why
This PR addresses the following problem / context:
How
Implementation summary - the following was changed / added / removed:
Notes
Any special considerations, workarounds, or follow-up work to note?